Published in The Daily Sun
Sunday, 7th October, 2012
The
first presidential debate at the University of Denver has clearly gone by
approval of the pollsters and analysts to Mitt Romney by a wide margin. The
spin doctors in the Mitt Romney team were in broad smiles because their
candidate not just held against the President; they thought Mitt Romney was
more relaxed and did most of the attacking that put the President on the defensive
and lose out in making the case against the candidate as a protector of the top
2% Americans against the poor and the middle class.
In
a way, what Mitt Romney succeeded in doing in the first of the three
Presidential debates on schedule was to turn the table on the President on what
was becoming the major liability of his campaign; that he is against the middle
class; a “Richie Rich.”. He in fact succeeded in turning his liability to his
advantage; a liability that has pegged his campaign that worsened when his views
about the middle class became known to the public following the release of a
video taken in secret. In that video, Mitt Romney was caught making disparaging
remarks about 47% middle class Americans who depend on the Government.
The
Obama supporters were surprised at the failure of the President to bring the
47% issue into his debate right at the beginning. They were aghast when the
President remained silent on it even when Mitt Romney projected himself repeatedly
on health care, taxation, job creation, as the champion of the middle class.
Some analysts suggested that the President must have been under instruction
from his team to be presidential. They felt that as a result, he decided before
starting the first debate that he would not bring the 47% issue. Nevertheless,
analysts sympathetic to the President failed to understand why the President
chose to remain presidential when right before everyone’s eyes, the candidate
scored points on the middle class where his campaign was on the defensive till
right before the debate. President Obama allowed his opponent to hijack his
campaign’s trump card with the nation watching.
Mitt
Romney’s strategy was simple and clear. He attacked the President for running
an administration that has been high spending that has inflated the federal
deficit, an issue that is of serious concern to the voters. He also attacked
the President for failure to create jobs that has placed all Americans,
particularly the middle class and the poor in dire economic plight. He defended
tax cuts across the board and no new taxes for the rich but stated that the tax
cuts and no new taxes for the rich will bring more revenue to the government
and will have no adverse impact on the deficit. He explained this by stating
that the rich 2% Americans will use the tax breaks to invest more that will
create more jobs and with more people getting jobs, the government will earn
more revenue from income tax.
The
President failed to expose the weaknesses and the vagueness in the Romney plan.
The figures Mitt Romney gave simply did not add up and in some instances like
his proposal for tax cuts, he changed figures in the debate from previously
stated ones. The President incredibly failed to flag the arithmetic that Bill
Clinton had used so effectively to successfully criticize the challenger at the
NDC. He allowed Mitt Romney to describe
his administration as one engaged in wasteful government programmes. When Mitt Romney
accused the President of spending US$ 90 billion in wasteful projects in
developing green energy where the beneficiaries were party supporters where some
projects have failed, the President did not defend the attack. It was in
healthcare that the President’s performance disappointed his supporters the
most. In a turnaround from what he had said before, that he would repeal
Obamacare on his very first day in office, Mitt Romney embraced the policy;
mentioned that he had succeeded with such a policy while Governor of
Massachusetts and promised that he will improve upon it if he became President. Mitt
Romney said that he will also ensure that in his health policy, the elderly who
are under Medicare will face no problem; instead they will be entitled better
benefits.
Mitt
Romney argued in his debate for an America where the people will see the power
of the federal government significantly diminished and that of the private
sector significantly enhanced. He said that the private sector creates the
overwhelming majority of the jobs in America and provides the major portion of
the federal government’s revenue. He therefore argued that the federal
government should facilitate the private sector instead of taxing and
regulating it more. While arguing against a powerful federal government, Mitt Romney’s
proposed strengthening the state governments instead, allowing them more powers
and finance in critical areas such as health care for instance. He did not explain
how people will be benefitted when it is the state government holding the
powers instead of the federal government. The President did not ask any
question to the candidate about it. The President also did not question when
the candidate stated that people will be better off negotiating with insurance
companies about their healthcare issues as
against the board in Obamacare although
everybody in USA agrees that the insurance companies are the major reason of
the prohibitive prices of healthcare as well and the major cause of
people’s sufferings.
Mitt
Romney reiterated the conservative agenda; against big government and more
private enterprise although he did not give any clear picture about how less
government and more private enterprise will tackle USA’s current economic predicament,
the worst in many decades. He also blamed the policies of the Obama
administration for miseries of the people without explaining how or what he
will do different. President Obama failed to expose the vagueness of Mitt
Romney’s case for America. He defended his policies instead but went into facts
and figures to maintain that his administration is on right track on governance
and on the economy making him look “listless”; “professorial” and under
prepared for the debate. In contrast, Mitt Romney was animated, left no one in
doubt he was well prepared and appeared like he enjoyed the debate.
The
polls showed that Mitt Romney won the
debate 67% to 25%; a major achievement for him having entered it as the
underdog. Nevertheless, in USA’s complex voting dynamics and voters’ mindset; the
debate has affected mostly those who have already made up their minds. Despite his
impressive performance, Mitt Romney did not say anything new to change the minds
of the undecided or the trend that has been building in favour of the President
since the Democratic National Convention and particularly his 47% faux pas. The
President could have helped his candidature by a solid performance to put more
sail into his candidature. In that he failed. With 2 more debates to come, the
President must show his worth lest the undecided voters begin to take serious
notice of Mitt Romney.
The
writer is a retired Secretary and a former Ambassador.
No comments:
Post a Comment