Dr. Yunus finally decides to fight
The Holiday, July 18th., 2013
M. Serajul Islam
It is
encouraging for the nation that Noble Laureate Dr. Mohammad Yunus is finally
standing up for himself and the Grameen Bank. He allowed himself to be badgered/humiliated/belittled
far too long by his adversaries. He watched silently the institution he built
from scratch into one recognized worldwide that brought it and him the Noble
Prize and the country great pride and the rare opportunity to revamp its very
poor international image being demolished systematically. It has been the
latest insensitive news that the Government is going to implement the decision
of the Commission on Grameen Bank to divide the world famous institution into
19 parts to place it under the government’s control that has ended the Noble
Lauareate's patience.
In the short
time after the Government made its intention public, Dr. Yunus has shown the
intention to take the fight to those who for reasons they alone can explain
have been belittling and humiliating him and his achievements when some of the
greatest leaders of our time of the likes of Nelson Mandela, President Barak
Obama and others have expressed their support for him and the Grameen Bank as
his friends and admirers. The Grameen Bank he created is today being replicated
around the world for poverty alleviation. He is one of seven individuals who have won
three of the greatest awards in current times, namely the Noble Peace Prize,
the US Predident's Gold Medal and the Congressional Medal of Honour. These are
not all his international achievements; there are far too many to easily make
him the most honoured personality in the current international arena. His
current preoccupation with Social Business has earned him even more recognition
and many think that another Nobel Prize, this time in Economics, may be waiting
for him.
With the Noble
Laureate deciding enough is enough and vowing that he would not allow the
Government to dismantle the Grameen Bank, there is now a bee line of politicians/
political parties who have suddenly felt the need to show that they are no
longer afraid to be seen in public with him to support his cause and sympathise
in his predicament. Perhaps this is so because the Noble Laureate has realized belatedly
that he needs to stand for himself and the Grameen Bank in order to save his
institution and his name, honour and dignity. The Finance Minister, no doubt
surprised to find Dr. Yunus suddenly showing the intent to fight and no longer
willing to play the role of the sparring partner for the Government, expressed
both contempt and sarcasm when he said he knew too well all the time that the Noble
Laureate is a "politician", like being a politician is a bad quality
that Dr. Yunus has been hiding forgetting that he too has turned into a
politician after a lifetime as a bureaucrat.
Dr. Yunus
should take no offense in what the Finance Minister has said. In fact, he
should thank the Minister for reminding him that he is a politician for that
may be the way out of his current strange predicament of being honoured around
the world yet being humiliated in his own country by his own government. Nevertheless, the FM's comment about Dr. Yunus
was surely not complimentary. Perhaps like the Finance Minister, the Noble
Laureate had also been having negative impression of a politician. The FM’s
sarcastic comment should however encourage Dr. Yunus to look into whether being
a politician is a bad thing after all. If he does, he will find that over two
millenniums ago, the Greek philosopher Aristotle had said unequivocally that
"man is by nature a political animal." Many brilliant minds after the
great philosopher have likewise upheld the indispensability of
politics for civilized existence.
These
philosophers have stressed that it is crucial for human societies to channel
this natural instinct present in all humans for good of all. Some societies
have succeeded in doing this by ensuring that those upon whom the task of channeling
political instincts has been given – the politicians- are those who can rise
over their personal needs and interests to serve the common good. Others have
failed in organizing the natural political instinct because the politicians
upon whom the task has been given have used the trust to serve their own
personal interests and needs. It is the latter societies that have given
politics and politicians the bad name.
Nevertheless,
politics is the only way for any society/country to move to a higher level
through conflict resolution and decision making for common good. The objective
for any society/country is thus to organize its politics for common good by
ensuring that people with intent of serving the common good go into politics
and become politicians. From this perspective, Bangladesh is struggling because
its politics is not organized for the common good and most of those who have
entered politics are not interested or bothered to work for the common good
notwithstanding what they publicly profess all the time. When the Finance
Minister was calling Dr. Yunus a politician, he was no doubt saying that the
Noble Laureate is like the politician in Bangladesh, one interested in his own
good while talking publicly of being interested in the common good, the
qualities present in a hypocrite. The Prime Minister in her most recent
comments about the NB has said exactly what the FM alluded in his comment; she
has called Dr. Yunus “selfish” together with a host of other attributes that
except the inner circles of the power establishment of Bangladesh, very few
outside believe.
When history
reflects on the period we are now passing, we will have to answer as a nation what
made us belittle such a great man in his country of birth! Many great
individuals have won the Noble Peace Prize but when one considers the history
of all Noble Peace Laureates, Dr. Yunus stands out in a class by himself. Yet,
we have suggested that a Noble Peace Prize can be won simply by being in the
right company, sipping white wine and cheese to humiliate him! He has most
recently been charged of wining the Noble Prize with the help of the Clinton
Foundation that lobbied for him with the Noble Peace Prize Committee with funds
provided by Telenor!! He has also been
accused by his own government of corruption while running an institution that
has been also awarded the Noble Prize with him without the charge being proved.
In fact, a commission set by the Government itself found the charge’s untenable
but that did not deter the government from hounding and pursuing him.
In choosing to
belittle the Noble Laureate, the government has missed literally a God given
instrument to further its foreign policy goals in which are embedded its own
future and that of the country. Dr. Yunus could have opened Bangladesh’s doors
to the powerful countries/institutions and individuals and with that the opportunity
to further the country’s interests. It is not just that the government missed
out on this opportunity; it has by the way it treated the Noble Laureate in the
face of requests from these quarters for a fair treatment for him, annoyed and
upset them by turning down the requests with disdain. Therefore, when this
government needed these governments/institutions/individuals for assisting it
for Bangladesh’s interests, they have declined.
The withdrawal
of GSP by USA is a case in point. It has been withdrawn for problems of the RMG
sector where the USA does not provide GSP facilities while the sectors from
which it has withdrawn have no problems to warrant the withdrawal. Likewise,
the World Bank would have very well found ways to accommodate Bangladesh on the
Padma bridge loan had the government not upset those who have overriding powers
over the WB over Dr. Yunus. The way the
government handled Dr. Yunus has not just hampered Bangladesh’s national
interests; it has harmed the ruling party’s political fortunes in the country.
The latest goofing over the Chinese funding for the Padma Bridge between the
Finance Minister and the Communications Minister should remind the ruling party
what a mess it has made over one of its major electoral commitments when the time
to answer for it is staring at it with
the next elections just round the corner.
The above
notwithstanding, the importance of Dr. Mohammad Yunus to Bangladesh has not
diminished. In fact, it has enhanced for it has now been established that had
the government not messed with him, its own fortune and that of the country
would have been much better. Looking into the future, a dark cloud of
uncertainty seems to be ahead for the country because its politics is going up
the wrong path and politicians are becoming more confrontational. At this
critical time, the country is yearning for help for if this confrontational
politics is not avoided; the country would slide into disaster. It is in this
context that Dr. Yunus should consider the FM’s comment about being a
politician. It is also in this context that he should consider the bee line of
politicians and political parties now coming to his doors. He should also
consider that the country today sees in him an answer to their prayers to come
into politics and straighten a lot of the imperfections in it.
In reflecting
on his future, Dr. Yunus should consider that his future and the country’s are coming
to a convergence as it had done once before when the army officers had gone to
him to take charge of the last caretaker government. Had he not declined that
offer, perhaps the country’s future would have taken a much better course than
it has. With another opportunity at his door, he should now seriously consider
entering politics to be a sobering and positive influence for politics and
politicians. He does not have to join any of the political parties. He does not
have to form a political party either. As he has said himself, he has 8.4
million GB subscribers and 20,000 workers who can be his political cadre not
for assuming political power but to remind the politicians that there is a
third force under his leadership who are unwilling to let politicians mess up
the lives of the people for their own interests.
Dr. Yunus
should also consider that the large civil society so far leaderless is also
yearning for a sense of direction. If he enters politics and decides to give
leadership to the civil society, he could give the mainstream political parties
a fight so that in future they just cannot do as they please. Our recent
experiences have shown that the two mainstream parties – the AL and the BNP-
are not going anywhere but that they are capable of doing a lot of harm to the
country through failure in governance. A strong unified civil society that we
do not have at the moment that he could
help build could be a sobering influence upon the political parties to perform
and also an insurance against the country going to the hands of the extra
constitutional forces, the army.
The country
has followed Dr. Yunus’ recent intent to fight his predicament positively and
with a lot of hope and expectations. He should not disappoint the country a
second time. Politics is a noble preoccupation. He should keep what Aristotle
and other great philosophers have said about politics in perspective and use
his political instincts to fight for himself, his Grameen Bank and the country
in the same spirit he has fought for 8.4 million GB subscribers in the country
to bring them out of poverty and given them a future that has made him one of
the most talked about and respected individuals worldwide. Dr. Yunus must realize that his only way to
fight and save the GB lies in politics and that by entering politics; he can
also do the country and its politics a great favour.
At the time of
filing this article, there is more bad news for the opponents of Dr. Yunus in
Bangladesh. Wall Street Journal has just named him as one of the top
influential economists/business thinkers together with Joseph Stiglitz, Bill
Gates, Michael Porter, Thomas Friedman,
Eric Schmidt, Richard Branson, Malcolm Gladwell, Robert Reich, Jack Welch, Niall Ferguson,
Michael Dell, Howard Gardner an Jimmy Wales. Perhaps those opposing and
humiliating him will now spare a moment and think whether a man in such h21qcompany
can be the same man they are hounding.
The writer is a retired career
Ambassador.
No comments:
Post a Comment