Swing states could return President Obama to the White
House
Daily Sun
August 5th., 2012
M. Serajul Islam
The fight for
the White House is becoming more and more intense with just 100 days or so left
for the Presidential election on November 6th. The President is
still ahead in most of the
country’s opinion polls but only by a whisker. The President and his re-election team are
therefore very worried. The economy is their main concern. The 2nd
quarter GDP growth rate released last week was 1.5% which is not good enough to
bring down unemployment rate from the 8.2% which is bad news for President
Obama. There is little chance of the economy improving between now and Election
Day for assuring President Obama to return to the White House for another term.
There is no debate in the USA that it is the economy that will
determine whether it would be President Obama or his challenger Governor Mitt
Romney who would win on 6th November. In other words, “it is the
economy, stupid” that will decide who the next President of the United Sates would
be. In respect of the economy, the voters are most concerned with the
unemployment figure which is high for a victory for President Obama. In fact,
if the figure stands at that on or around November 6th, President Obama would
be in real danger of losing the reelection bid.
However, in the complex equation of numbers that determine outcome
of a presidential election in the United States, there is a concept that
explains its electoral politics like it does in no other country. Each of the fifty states is granted electoral
votes based on its population to form with the other states, the Electoral
College that elects a US President. The voters in each state votes for the
candidates and the candidate who wins by a simple majority, takes all the
electoral votes of that state in a “winner takes all” system. The candidate who
can bag 270 of the 538 electoral votes becomes the President.
In the United States, the majority of the states are traditionally
either Republican or Democrat; in other words either conservative (Republican)
or liberal (Democrat). For instance, the
southern states such as Mississippi, Alabama and South Carolina are
conservative and thus vote Republican. Then there are liberal states such as
California, New York, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island that vote traditionally
for the Democrat. In the 2000 presidential election, journalist Tim Russert
used the Red for the Republican Party and Blue for the Democrats and since then,
the colours have been used to divide the US electoral map. Presidential
candidates take these states for granted where they spend comparatively less
time campaigning as they know they would win or lose in these in states anyway
based on their colours.
Outside these states, there are states where voters are not
committed to either of the two main parties based on their conservative or
liberal leanings. These are the swing states where the candidates spend most of
their time campaigning. These swing states are in the end the states whose
Electoral College votes eventually determine which of the candidates go to the
White House. These are also the states where the candidates spend most of their
time campaigning to win the White House. Often these states are also called the
battle ground states.
There are 12 states that are the swing states for this year’s
election. These are Florida, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, Wisconsin, Iowa, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan, Nevada,
Colorado and North Carolina. It is in these swing states that the election team
of President Obama is seeing a glimmer of hope against the gloomy national
picture of the economy. In seven of these swing states- Pennsylvania, Ohio,
Virginia, Wisconsin, New Mexico, New Hampshire and Iowa-, the unemployment
figure is below the national average. In Virginia and New Mexico, the
unemployment figure is a full 1% less than the national figure. The June
unemployment figure in New Hampshire, Virginia and Iowa was just 6%. In Ohio
that is a major swing state and where the economy has taken a battering due to
the collapse of the manufacturing sector, unemployment figure is at 7.2%, one
percentage lower than the national figure. In 4 of the 12 swing states where
unemployment figure is over the national figure, the trend is one of decline.
No candidate has made it to the White House in the last few
presidential elections without winning at least 2 of the three swing states,
Pennsylvania, Florida and Ohio. There is
more good news for the President from these 3 key states. The national economic
gloom notwithstanding, a CBS/NTY/Quinnipiac University poll conducted last week
gives President Obama a clear lead in these swing states. "If
today were Nov. 6, President Barack Obama would sweep the key swing
states," said Peter Brown, Assistant Director of the Quinnipiac University
Polling Institute.
President Obama had entered the White House with a promise of
change that encouraged Americans who were frustrated by 8 years of President
Bush when the country was dragged to wars overseas at great human and financial
costs that ruined the economy, to vote for him. He had also captured the
imagination of the world who expected that he would eventually emerge as a
President in the mould of John F Kennedy. The Muslim world expected that he
would bring the Muslim and the western worlds closer and would focus seriously
on the Palestinian sufferings.
The President’s only major success in his first term has been in
foreign policy but that too partially. He ended US military involvement in Iraq
and has set the road map for bringing US troops from Afghanistan, home. He has
also delivered to Americans the scalp of OBL and the top Al Qaeda leadership. Unfortunately,
foreign policy is not playing any major part in the election and his good work
in Iraq and Afghanistan is not going to be of much help to give him a second
term. He has also failed to do very little to the Muslim world. On Palestine,
he allowed his administration to be dictated by the Israelis.
His promise to Americans of a better economic future failed
although for this he has his predecessor and events outside his hands in Europe
to blame. Surprisingly, however,, he failed to hold the President Bush responsible in a major way for
USA’s current economic gloom. He entered
the White House with Abraham Lincoln as his hero. Instead of blaming his
predecessor, he extended his arms towards the Republicans trying to build
bipartisanship for his administration. Unfortunately, the Republicans hounded
him in the most partisan way possible. He had not just won the White House
convincingly; he also started his administration with a Democratic majority in
both House of the Congress. Under relentless attacks of the Republican, the
President wavered in pushing forcefully his election promises to Americans. In
the midterm elections for the US Congress in his second year in office; the
Democrats lost their majority in the House of Representatives. Many who voted
him to power on his promise of change became disenchanted with him. The
President had only himself to blame. Americans do not like a wavering President.
Recently, President Obama’s health care policy has been given the
green signal by the Supreme Court. This will also help his candidature as a
large number of hitherto uninsured Americans (nearly 50 million) would be
expected to get affordable healthcare under its purview. However without the
economy on his side, neither this health care policy nor his successes in
foreign affairs can guarantee his return to the White House.
Therefore the favourable signs in the economy in the swing states,
particularly in the context of the unemployment figures, could eventually help
President Obama return again to the White House provided the current trend moves in the right direction for him.
Nevertheless, the outcome at this stage is still too close for call. Apart from
the economy, the national debates in which the candidates would be locked
closer to the election date would also have a major impact on the outcome.
The writer is a retired
career diplomat and former Ambassador to Japan and Egypt
No comments:
Post a Comment