Daily Sun
December 23, 2012
M. Serajul Islam
Dr.
Qader Khan, the Father of Pakistan’s Nuclear Bomb, has dug out the unresolved
issues of 1971 from the archive of history in an article he wrote for The News
International captioned “Events of 1971”. Dr. Khan said that the situation in
Pakistan today is worse than it was in 1971 and that unless the current socio-
political problems of Pakistan are resolved satisfactorily, Pakistan could
split again.
In
making the doomsday prediction for Pakistan, he reflected on issues that caused
the split of Pakistan and the emergence of Bangladesh as an independent and
sovereign state in 1971. In the process, he has brought out into public discussion
the events of 1971 that all Pakistan Governments and the people of Pakistan
have consistently pushed under the carpet in an attempt to write history their
own way, denying their responsibilities for some of the worst crimes that could
be committed by a government on its own people by use of the state’s powers.
Dr. Khan wrote: “We saw our own army killing our own people…I was ashamed to
see such cruel acts could be perpetrated by Muslims against Muslims- Pakistanis
against fellow Pakistanis.”
There
have not been many Pakistanis of the stature of Dr. Khan who have acknowledged the
crimes committed by their military in Bangladesh in 1971. In addition to
acknowledging the massacre of “hundreds of thousands” by the Pakistani army in
Bangladesh in 1971, Dr. Khan also mentioned the mindset of West Pakistanis that
created the pre-conditions for the split of Pakistan in 1971. He wrote that the
West Pakistanis treated East Pakistan as a colony, the same way “the British
used to treat West Pakistanis.” He further wrote that while millions in
Pakistan knew of the reasons why the Bangladesh tragedy occurred, the Pakistan
military and political establishment were oblivious to these.
Dr.
Khan who transformed Pakistan from a developing third world country to an
important player in world politics by giving the country the nuclear bomb did
not write the article out of love for his former compatriots or regret for what the Pakistani military did
in Bangladesh in 1971. He wrote it out of deep concerns that a worse situation is
prevailing in Pakistan at the moment where the political and military establishments
are trying to subdue the people by force that he thinks will fail because it
failed in Bangladesh against “docile” people and thus cannot succeed in
Pakistan where the people are “martial.” Dr. Khan feels that Pakistan’s current
predicament is due to the fact that the country did not take lessons for the
crimes that its military committed in Bangladesh in 1971. No one was questioned,
let alone be punished and Pakistan did not learn any lesson from “past tragic
mistakes.”
Dr.
Khan’s article has raised many
interesting issues about Pakistan; its misdeeds in Bangladesh in 1971; and
about the two-nation theory that created Pakistan in 1947 by breaking an
undivided India into a Hindu majority India and Muslim majority Pakistan. It
would be an interesting exercise to consider these issues in some length to
consider where Bangladesh stands as a result of the two-nation theory and
whether its emergence in 1971 was a proof that the two-nation theory upon which
the British had created Pakistan was right or wrong. But then it is not the
purpose of this piece to dwell into those issues.
In
September 1972, when I was in Kabul with thousands of Bangladeshis who were
fleeing from Pakistan to an independent Bangladesh, I and a few of my
colleagues in the erstwhile Civil Service of Pakistan and the erstwhile
Pakistan Foreign Service had a chance meeting in the streets of Kabul with a
senior Pakistani civil servant whom we knew while serving in Pakistan and who
had served for quite some time in East Pakistan in the subdivision and district
administrations. He was a Pathan. We talked for a long time that day. He was ecstatic that we had found our freedom
and hugged and embraced each one of us to express his happiness. At the end of
the hugs and the embraces, he told us that while he felt happy for us that we
had found our freedom from Pakistan, for his people (meaning the Pathans) the
dream of freedom was unrealistic because they would be chased and subdued where
they would have no place to run because of their geographical contiguity with
Pakistan.
The
senior Pakistani civil servant revealed
to us in 1972 what was the state of
affairs in Pakistan at the time when Pakistan had already broken into 2 with
the emergence of Bangladesh when similar hopes of breaking from Pakistan was also in the hearts of the Pathans. Between
that period and Dr. Khan’s article, Pakistan’s political; military and civil leadership
dominated by Punjab have not made serious efforts to strengthen Pakistani
nationalism by giving the weaker federating units the sense that they all were
receiving fair treatment from the Centre. The leaders of Pakistan have tried to
hold Pakistan together the same way they tried to hold East Pakistan by playing
the Islam card and force. The Pathans, unlike the Bangladeshis, did not enter
into Pakistan out of their own volition but “by gentle as well as coercive persuasion”.
Pakistan’s
major mistake between 1971 and today has been its failure to take lessons from what
it did to Bangladesh. Instead of punishing the military rulers who broke
Pakistan, the government that succeeded the military dictatorship of General
Yahya Khan pampered the military instead. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto who became Prime
Minister after the emergence of Bangladesh expressed no regret that East
Pakistan was lost; instead he aroused national pride for the fact that a large
number of Pakistani soldiers were prisoners in India. He thus craftily shifted
the focus from the military who had committed crimes against humanity in
Bangladesh and from those who ordered these crimes be committed. Thus when
these soldiers returned to Pakistan after the Simla Agreement was signed in
1972, they were received as heroes and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto basked in glory for
his achievement!
Zulfiqar
Ali Bhutto had his own reasons to do what he did. He could not have taken
action against the Pakistani military establishment of the time because of his
own complicity in the crimes that were committed in Bangladesh to which he was
as much a party as was Yahya Khan and his men. In fact, many would say that the
entire plot of the Bangladesh genocide may have come from his evil mind. He saw the Pakistan military roll out the
tanks on unarmed civilians in Dhaka and landed in Karachi to tell in media that
Pakistan had been saved. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto of course paid the price of his
complicity and was hanged by the very military establishment that he had
protected for the crimes it had committed in 1971.
The
ghost of 1971 may be catching up with
Pakistan itself as Dr. Khan’s article suggests. Pakistan is in real danger of a
split but before that civil strife in the country could cause it to fail
instead. It may still not be too late for the Pakistani leadership to reflect
upon 1971 that could help it keep the country together. A start in the right
direction would be to extend to Bangladesh a formal apology for the crimes
against humanity its military committed in 1971. Together with the apology,
Pakistan must come out with a White Paper on 1971 to pinpoint responsibility
for one of the worst crimes against humanity committed in recent history for
which no one has been held responsible or punished.
The writer is a retired career
Ambassador
No comments:
Post a Comment